Penalty for giving or taking dowry
(1) If any person, after the commencement of this Act, gives or takes or abets the giving or taking of dowry, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than five years, and with fine which shall not be less than fifteen thousand rupees or the amount of the value of such dowry, whichever is more:
Provided that the Court may, for adequate and special reasons to be recorded in the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than five years.
(2) Nothing in sub-section (1) shall apply to, or in relation to,—
(a) presents which are given at the time of a marriage to the bride (without any demand having been made in that behalf):
Provided that such presents are entered in a list maintained in accordance with the rules made under this Act;
(b) presents which are given at the time of a marriage to the bridegroom (without any demand having been made in that behalf):
Provided that such presents are entered in a list maintained in accordance with the rules made under this Act:
Provided further that where such presents are made by or on behalf of the bride or any person related to the bride, such presents are of a customary nature and the value thereof is not excessive having regard to the financial status of the person by whom, or on whose behalf, such presents are given.
In plain English
What this section actually means
Section 3 is the central offence-creating provision. Sub-section (1) criminalises three acts: giving dowry, taking dowry, and abetting either. Both sides of the transaction are guilty — the bride's father who pays, the groom or his family who receive, and any matchmaker who arranges.
The punishment after the 1986 amendment is severe — minimum 5 years' imprisonment and fine of not less than ₹15,000 or the value of the dowry, whichever is higher. The Proviso allows reduction below the minimum for 'adequate and special reasons recorded'. Courts have read this strictly.
Sub-section (2) carves out two narrow safe harbours. Clause (a) covers presents to the bride at the marriage without any demand — provided entered in the rules-prescribed list. Clause (b) covers presents to the bridegroom on the same basis, with the additional safeguard that if from the bride's side, the presents must be 'customary' and 'not excessive' having regard to the giver's financial status.
The list-maintenance requirement is crucial. Without a contemporaneous signed list, the prosecution can refuse to treat the items as gifts.
Visual
See how it flows
Real life
What this looks like in real life
Bride's father caught between law and custom
Setup. The bride's father is told (informally) that the groom's family expects ₹10 lakh in cash and gold worth ₹15 lakh. He pays.
What the law does. Both giver (bride's father) and taker (groom / family) are guilty under Section 3(1). 'I had no choice' is no defence. Section 3 makes giving a substantive offence — Parliament wanted both demand and supply costly.
Customary ornaments — what's 'excessive'?
Setup. Bride's family gives the groom a gold chain and ring worth ₹1.5 lakh, in line with community custom. Family's annual income ₹6 lakh.
What the law does. Section 3(2)(b) safe harbour can apply if (i) no demand, (ii) list maintained, (iii) presents customary and not excessive. A 25% annual-income gift is plausibly within bounds; the court considers all surrounding facts.
Cross-references
Read this alongside
- Dowry Prohibition (Maintenance of Lists of Presents) Rules, 1985§Rules 2, 3·Form, content and signature requirements for the present-list under Section 3(2).
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023§Section 80·Dowry death — uses Section 2 of this Act for 'dowry'.
Frequently asked
Questions about Section 3
Open this section in the source PDF
dowry_prohibition.pdf
Page 1–2 · opens in new tab