Reports of Government Analysts
Any document purporting to be a report signed by a Government analyst may be used as evidence of the facts stated therein in any proceeding under this Act.
In plain English
What this section actually means
Section 14 is a single-sentence evidence rule but a powerful one. A document 'purporting to be a report signed by a Government Analyst' is, by itself, evidence of its contents in any proceeding under the Act. The court does not have to insist on oral testimony of the Analyst as a matter of course; the report is admissible on the strength of Section 14.
This is the legal cousin of Section 293 of the CrPC (now corresponding provision under BNSS, 2023), which makes scientific-officer reports admissible. The rule is rebuttable — the accused can summon the Analyst or attack the report — but the burden has shifted.
Note the words 'purporting to be'. The court does not interrogate authorship at the threshold; it accepts the report on its face and lets the parties challenge it through evidence.
Real life
What this looks like in real life
Defence does not summon the Analyst
Setup. In a Section 15 prosecution, the prosecution files a signed Government Analyst report. The defence does not summon the Analyst for cross-examination.
What the law does. Section 14 lets the court act on the report as prima facie evidence. The defence forfeits the chance to dent its weight by failing to cross-examine. Convictions can rest on the report alone where the chain of custody is intact.
Cross-references
Read this alongside
- Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (now Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023)§Section 293 CrPC / 329 BNSS·Analogous provision making scientific officer's report admissible without oral testimony.
Frequently asked
Questions about Section 14
Open this section in the source PDF
Environment Protection Act, 1986.pdf
Page 11 · opens in new tab